2025.6.28

チサタキ33/20代/男性

4.5

0

面白い

このレビューはネタバレを含みますこのレビューはネタバレを含みます
アクション映画なのに哲学的な問いをぶっ込んでくるスタンスが新鮮で、何度観ても考えさせられる。モーフィアスの「真実を知る覚悟はあるか」って問いかけ、あれだけで引き返せなくなる感覚があるし、ネオの覚醒のプロセスがちゃんと段階を踏んでるのが説得力ある。トリニティの戦い方、無駄がなくてスタイリッシュ。エージェント・スミスの無機質な感じも怖すぎて、人間より人間くさい怒りが逆に皮肉。後半の銃撃戦のシーンは技術的にも演出的にも他を圧倒してる。スタイルだけじゃない芯の強さがある。今見返しても、時代を超えて強い作品。レビューを読む

2025.5.2

さもん/40代/女性

5.0

0

今まで見たことのない技法が使われており、とても驚きました。トリニティのバレットタイムなんて、何度も見なおしたくらいです。設定も仮想現実と現実世界を行き来するという未来で、とても斬新なSF映画だと思います。
登場人物がスタイリッシュで服装などもかっこよかったです。

2025.4.12

江分利満/50代/男性

5.0

0

面白い 映像が綺麗 ハラハラ

これには度肝を抜かれました。まさに「こんな映画観たことない！」という類の革命的な映画だったと思います。そしてこの映画に影響を与えたのが日本のアニメーション、特に押井守監督の映画だったりしたことに本当に興奮しました。日本でこういう実写ができたら良いのに！と悔しい思いも感じました。とはいえこのマトリックスの面白さにはただただ感動と興奮でした。物語も良い、アクションも良い、映像が斬新、のみならず映画愛アニメ愛に溢れる小ネタやディテール描写がもうため息もので、こんなに面白い映画があって良いのか！とまで思います。今観てもその面白さは色褪せてませんでした。素晴らしいです。

2025.3.3

Nynzzy/40代/女性

4.0

0

ネオが覚醒して無双するシーンは鳥肌モノだし、トリニティのバレットタイムも痺れる。エージェント・スミスの不気味さも最高。観終わった後、みんなサングラスかけたくなるやつ笑

映像もストーリーも、アクションもスタイリッシュだし、「現実とは何か？」ってテーマもめちゃくちゃ深い。

2025.3.2

LYCO/30代/女性

4.0

0

仮想現実と現実が入り混じる世界観の発想がめちゃくちゃ面白いし、初めて見たときの衝撃は忘れられない。特にネオが真実を知っていく過程はワクワクするし、戦闘シーンのスタイリッシュさも抜群。スローモーションの弾避けやカンフーアクションも痺れるくらいかっこいい。何よりキアヌ・リーブスがハマり役すぎて惚れる。続編も面白いけど、やっぱり1作目が1番好き。シンプルに完成度が高い。

2025.2.24

Ken Chewings/60代/男性

5.0

0

このレビューはネタバレを含みますこのレビューはネタバレを含みます

NeoAbiogenesis - Origin of Life Hypothesis.
By Kevin Reuter (the 'ctrl-h text macro indi app dev) NY

Abstract:

Nucleic acids form spontaneously in certain chemical and atmospheric conditions without biosynthesis (Nat. Commun 2016, DOI: 10.1038/ncomms11238). The first nucleic acid catalysts were most likely binary two-complementing nucleotide pairs as the likelihood of all nucleotides being biologically synthesized is an order of magnitude less likely than just 2 encoding base pair partners. Nucleic acids form phosphodiester bonds with other nucleic acids spontaneously in the presence of sufficent energys, thus creating RNA strands spontaneously. These strands of spontaneously and randomly encoded RNA then find their corresponding base pairs spontaneously in no particular order by forming hydrogen bonds in the presence of or lack their of energy. The 40th nucleic acid, for instance, in the RNA chain can find its corresponding nucleotide 40th before the 10th nucleic acid, for instance, thereby creating a reverse copy of the original RNA molecule piecewise non-linearly. This newly formed RNA pair, commonly known as DNA, then goes through a spontaneous physical split down the hydrogen bonds (the weakst bond in a dna structue) of the DNA, like a "zipper," thus creating 2 copies of RNA. The new RNA strand being a mirror image of the original RNA molecule with possible mutations. This split doesn’t have to happen all at once and can be done in parts, promoting a DNA strand with multiple split sites. This process then repeats from there, with the ongoing repeating process for an indefinite time, and the newly RNA molecule performing its first replication, thus explaining the beginning of self-replication and the evolution of biomolecules.

Furthermore, I hypothesize that RNA would replicate in branches if RNA/DNA as a cobweb/branches of genomic information self-relocating/mutating piecewise, not as a whole, breaking off in random RNA/DNA pieces as well anywhere from 1 to N nucleotides. The entire genetic sequence does not need to be completely intact in order to have small segments of RNA/DNA replicate/mutate. This could mean that a huge cobweb/intertwining branches of RNA/DNA could suddenly lead to a mutation/advantageous dna sequence that completely sequesters itself from the huge RNA/DNA cobweb/intertwined branches of DNA in a vast part of and become a self-sufficient small chain of quickly replicating/mutating dna molecule without all the slag of its mother dna conglomerate molecule.

This spontaneous branching process of dna, which needs no precursor genes, catalysts, or enzymes, is purely to point out the fact that genetics don’t need to rely on precursor genes, catalysts, or enzymes to evolve and replicate, as self-replication evolution can occur without large precursor genes, catalysis, or enzymes at all. It would be a messy process.

I believe the fatty cell membrane developed as a result of liquid turbulence from tidal forces forming fatty bubbles around random collections of RNA, DNA, and loose nucleic acids with osmotic stress from salt concentration differentials inside and outside the cell membrane, causing the fatty membrane to pop, then reform around the RND, DNA, loose nucleic acids in a kind of extremely messy cell division with fractions of the whole carrying copies of the mother cells RNA and DNA.

Possible Experiment:

Make a sterile soup of individual nucleic acids via the abiogenesis experiment them at various temperatures and atmospheric conditions that change over time mimicking early Earth. See over time if ANY DNA forms. If any DNA forms without a biological precursor, we know that some RNA/DNA had to have randomly replicated itself using free nucleotides, resulting in a new DNA strand. This DNA, when heated (assuming near 98°C), should unzip down the hydrogen bonds and repeat the replication process with mutations.

Other related thoughts currently held by the belief for the origins of life states that nucleic acids form spontaneously in certain chemical and atmospheric conditions without biosynthesis (Nat. Commun 2016, DOI:10.1038/ncomms11238), yet binary chains of RNA formed without the ability to copy themselves until some random chunk of RNA lucked into a biomechaisum that replicated the RNA strand by nuclaic acid esterfication untill self replication devloped. I think this hypothesis is far more unlikely to be true because this would make self-recall of encoded RNA information an unlikely event.

The alternative hypothesis would be that the RNA molecule that split spontaneously replicated and created a copy of itself. Enzymes are called catalysts for DNA/RNA replication, which implies that DNA/RNA can replicate without enzymes at all, however much more slowly. This implication only goes further with the idea of my hypothesis, meaning RNA turns into DNA spontaneously (however slowly) more than into unique enzymes or without any enzyme catalyst involved.

Conditions That Must Be Met To Prove NeoAbiogenesis:

1. Phosphodiester bonds must form spontaneously without any bio precursor under any physical condition.


2. Hydrogen bonds must form spontaneously without any precursor, forming DNA from RNA spontaniously either due to high or low energys(raidation and or Electrostatic)


3. The newly formed hydrogen bonds must be broken much frequently brokem than any other bonds in the DNA/RNA structure, causing 2 RNA strands to result. It doesn't have to be completed as a partial decoupling of the DNA allows
for new RNA copies to be split off with the origonal in tact, this allows the new and old RNA to duplicate/mutate further



If all these conditions are met in laboratory conditions, replication of any strand length of DNA/RNA, this hypothesis should be considered true in cases across the cosmos as the actual origin of life and very likely the origin of life on Earth.

Previous Experimental Evidence:

The Miller-Urey experiment has already been proven that DNA can be synthesized in a sterile environment, thus providing my theory with background supporting evidemce. But it has never been postulated that DNA is an RNA molecule replicating itself, thus the "neoAbiogenesis" model. To prove my theory, we must rerun the experiment again and see if DNA strands are made in a sterile jar and never before seen in that sterile model. This is how we will know true "neoAbiogenesis" has occurred.レビューを読む

2024.12.5

Red33/50代/男性

5.0

0

未来と仮想現実をテーマにした革命的なSF映画。人間と機械との闘いが描かれ、アクションと哲学的要素が巧みに融合しています。特に「バレットタイム」と呼ばれるスローモーション技法や、緑色のデジタル世界の映像美が印象的。ネオが覚醒するシーンは映画史に残る名場面です。

2024.11.26

なたら/20代/男性

4.0

0

アクション、映像、内容がどれも素晴らしく面白い映画です。
ブリッジしながら避けるシーンは見たことがない人でも知ってると思います。
自分達の生きる世界が仮想空間だなんて考えたこともありませんでした。

2024.9.15

まっさん/30代/女性

5.0

0

この映画を初めて観たときは、世界中が驚かされたのではないでしょうか。すごく衝撃的だったのを覚えています。キアヌ・リーヴスを一躍世界的な大スターにした映画でもあり、ネオのあのムーブを日本中、いや世界中の人がマネをしたのではないでしょうか。仮想現実という言葉も、この映画を機に世界に広まったといっても過言ではないでしょう。世界中に影響を与えた、最高の映画です。

2023.8.9

名無し/50代/女性

3.0

0

天才ハッカーの冒険が描かれ、仮想現実と現実の境界が曖昧になる感じが面白い。キアヌ・リーヴスの演技も素晴らしい。ただ、ストーリーがやや複雑で理解しにくい部分も。でも、視覚的なアクションは圧巻！